Salzburg Global Fellows’ Recommendations on Resolving Russia’s Border Disputes and Reconstructing Formerly Occupied Territories

Fellows of Salzburg Global’s latest Pathways to Peace Initiative outline recommendations on resolving Russia’s border disputes and reconstructing formerly occupied territories.

From October 18-21, 2023, Salzburg Global Seminar hosted an off-the-record, high-level dialogue, “Bear With Us: What Is To Be Done About Russia?” to explore scenarios and questions about what to do about Russia in the mid- to long-term.

Discussions focused on what is to be done about Russia and what options exist for managing and mitigating increasing uncertainty and danger exuding from Moscow. Fellows shared insights into political, economic, and security developments within and across Russia, as well as on the dynamics of other ongoing conflicts on Europe’s periphery. Discussions also looked beyond the current war on Ukraine to other regions affected by Russian encroachment as well as other historical conflicts where lessons can be drawn. The goal is to help develop new thinking and new approaches for dealing with the intractable problem: What is to be done about Russia?

At the end of the program, three working groups developed a number of recommendations. These recommendations do not necessarily represent a consensus among participating Fellows, and many Fellows who contributed to the recommendations preferred to remain anonymous. However, a number of Fellows did wish to publicly endorse these recommendations.

This working group of Salzburg Global Fellows has outlined recommendations on what needs to be done to resolve Russia’s border disputes and how international partners can coordinate economic assistance for the reconstruction of territories formerly occupied by Russia. Upon the precondition of the victory of Ukraine over Russia and the evacuation of Russian troops from Ukrainian territory, Fellows suggested a peace conference that addresses the return of territories occupied by Russia, the restitution of assets, Russian demilitarization, the payment of war reparations, and more.

Read the working group’s recommendations here.

Endorsements:

  • Pavel Ivlev, Chairman, Committee for Russian Economic Freedom
  • Anders Aslund, Senior Fellow, Stockholm Free World Forum
  • Jaba Devdariani, Board Member UNAG / Soliciting editor Civil.ge, UN Association of Georgia / Civil.ge
  • Donald Jensen, Adjunct Professor, Krieger School of Arts and Sciences, Johns Hopkins University
  • Olena Perepelynska, Partner, Integrites
  • Candace Rondeaux, Senior Director, Future Frontlines Program, New America

Source: Salzburg Global Seminar, an independent non-profit organization

https://www.salzburgglobal.org/news/latest-news/article/salzburg-global-fellows-recommendations-on-resolving-russias-border-disputes-and-reconstructing-formerly-occupied-territories

Open letter to New York State senators

Ladies and Gentlemen,

On May 8, 2018, New York State Senate approved the Resolution J4960 Commemorating the 4th Annual New York Immortal Regiment March organized by the Russian Youth of America.

This resolution was presented by pro-Russian NYS Senator Luis R. Sepúlveda under the pretext of “observing heroism and honor the sacrifice of soldiers and citizens in World War II.”

We consider this resolution dangerous and detrimental to the national security of our country for it sets the precedent of support for Russian Federation’s aggressive propaganda by American elected politicians.

Read More “Open letter to New York State senators”

Pavel Ivlev about Interpol

Pavel Ivlev at the headquarters of Interpol / Photo by Pavel Ivlev
Pavel Ivlev at the headquarters of Interpol / Photo by Pavel Ivlev

Dear friends,

We bring to your attention the comments of the attorney, Executive director of KRES Poliskola and Chairman of the Committee for Russian Economic Freedom Pavel Ivlev to “The Atlantic” about the work of Interpol.

Mr. Ivlev talks about how the Russian authorities use the international police to persecute their political opponents.

Read More “Pavel Ivlev about Interpol”

Putinary Geology

mxqfrany89Everyone knows from school textbooks that Russia is extremely rich in mineral resources with the most valuable of them being oil and gas of course. Had Siberia not been rich in oil and gas, Putin could have probably been unable to stay in power that long, since without the “oil needle” hungry Russians would have told the usurper from the KGB to get lost a long time ago. However, he has been fortunate so far, and despite the fact that the importance of hydrocarbons as a source of energy has been slowly but steadily decreasing worldwide, the current Russian tsar still has enough oil revenues to provide for himself and his friends and to silence his electorate that has grown stupid from watching government-owned TV channels broadcasting state propaganda. Russia still has enough available stocks of mineral resources to maintain the status quo in the immediate and medium-term. As for the distant future, the Kremlin does not seem concerned about that at all. It is no surprise then that exploration activity is hardly being carried out in Russia, and geology as a science is slowly dying.

In April 2016, on Minister of Education and Science Dmitri Livanov’s orders, the Russian State Geological Prospecting University Read More “Putinary Geology”

From The Cherry Orchard to the Khimki Forest

 “You have no mercy on the woods, or the birds, or on women, or on one another…”

Uncle Vanya, А.P. Chekhov, 1896

photo by etosibir.ru
Photo by etosibir.ru

Chekhov’s Uncle Vanya and The Cherry Orchard were written more than a century ago, but they remain a brilliant portrait of Russian society and its attitude toward the world around, woods included.

Forests cover around 45 percent of Russia’s territory, and the country accounts for 24 percent of the world’s timber resources. The Siberian taiga and its cedar trees are as much a symbol of Russia as the Kremlin and Sputnik. It would seem that Russian forests should be valued and protected as a national treasure. However, just like the people of Russia, Russian forests have their own peculiar fate full of suffering and tragic mistakes.

Back in 2013, an international team of scientists calculated that from 2000 to 2012, Russia had lost more forest area than any other country in the world. Such forest cover loss was caused by different reasons including forest fires, storms and insect pests. However, this was also due in no small part to human activity. According to World Wildlife Fund’s estimates, Russia annually loses around $1 billion due to illegal logging.

According to First Deputy Prosecutor General Aleksander Buksman, illegal logging is responsible for more than 800,000 hectares of Russia’s forest loss annually, which is more than half of the total wood harvest in the country. Read More “From The Cherry Orchard to the Khimki Forest”

Stadiums Versus Hospitals

Photo by tranzewatte.livejournal.com
Photo by tranzewatte.livejournal.com

Russian healthcare, just like state-funded Soviet healthcare before it, has never been characterized by either quality or accessibility.  Despite rather large investments in the medical industry that both the federal and local budgets could afford during the period of high energy prices, the quality of medical care received by the population remains appallingly poor. There is a deficit of doctors, and their level of knowledge does not meet modern-day standards. There is a continuous deficit of effective drugs. Today, when oil revenues have plunged and there is no prospect of foreign investment, the question arises:  At whose expense will the government be cutting back on spending? The authorities have quickly found a solution on the federal level by gradually reducing healthcare spending for over a year. Local authorities act in a similar way. Only, whereas in Putin’s opinion, the government cannot cut down on “national security” spending (or in other words, federal expenditures on the police and special forces used to suppress popular unrest), local authorities use budget funds that were supposed to be spent on health care and education, for example, to build sports facilities for the upcoming 2018 FIFA World Cup instead. Thus, in St. Petersburg, funds originally intended for the construction of schools, daycare centers and healthcare facilities are going to be used to complete the construction of the Zenit Arena stadium.

Georgi Poltavchenko, Putin’s colleague from the Leningrad KGB and current governor of St. Petersburg, called this redistribution of funds a “technical solution” instead of admitting that the country that is rapidly sliding into poverty simply cannot afford an expensive World Cup. It would seem that it should not be difficult for
Read More “Stadiums Versus Hospitals”

Putin, Roldugin, Shamalov, Patrushev and the Rest of Homeowners

Apartment building in Moscow / Photo by apb1.ru
Apartment building in Moscow / Photo by apb1.ru

The widely known problems in Russia’s housing and communal services sector are not new. The entire sector is slowly but steadily deteriorating. This is no surprise since the average age of the Russian housing stock exceeds 40 years. Several tragedies happened over the last year. A residential building partially collapsed in Mezhdurechensk; household gas explosions occurred in Omsk, Perm, Yaroslavl and Volgograd; a bridge collapsed in Vladivostok; cars regularly get stuck in potholes as pavement collapses. Well-known Russian blogger Ilya Varlamov has repeatedly supplied evidence of dire housing conditions of ordinary Russians.

The federal authorities do not at all seem concerned about this situation. In 2016, federal allocations for the repair and replacement of utility lines as well as for the upgrading of the housing stock will amount to around 75 billion rubles or about half of the obviously ill-gotten $2 billion belonging to Putin’s close friend violinist Roldugin. There are plans to further cut federal spending on the housing and communal services sector in 2017 to more than half its 2016 amount.

In fact, why should Russia’s budget be spent on housing around 85 percent of which is privately owned? On the other hand, despite the mass privatization of apartments in the 1990s, public spaces and communal services of most apartment buildings such as entrance halls, courtyards, stairs, gas, electrical and plumbing have not been privatized and remain the responsibility of municipalities. The budget situation on the local level is obviously much worse than on the federal one. Read More “Putin, Roldugin, Shamalov, Patrushev and the Rest of Homeowners”